Is this the Golden Age of Buying? – Implications for sales professionals
Professional buying has come of age, reaching new heights in terms of importance and sophistication. But what are the implications for sales people?
In this article we turn to the UK Chartered Institute of Purchasing and Supply and the US Institute of Supply Management to provide a new insight to the changing roles and perspectives of those on the other side of table.
The Key Trends in Purchasing.
Traditional Purchasing
|
New Age Purchasing
|
|
Function
|
Administrative
|
Strategic
|
Objective
|
Cutting costs
|
Boosting corporate success
|
Focus
|
Lowest price
|
Value, flexibility & innovation
|
Supplier Relationships
|
Adversarial
|
Collaborative
|
Organisation
|
Stand alone
|
Integrated
|
How Purchasing Contributes to Organizational Success.
The success of an organization is dictated by the performance, flexibility and innovation of all those members of its supply chain. Maximizing this performance is the principal motivation for a more structured approach to organizational buying.
Another motivating factor for greater sophistication of the buying function is to protect the customer from opportunistic vendors and bad deals. In short, building buying confidence and skill enables buyers to defend against the ploys and tactics of the sales person, while at the same time negotiating better deals and developing more successful vendor relationships.
Finally, there is also the motivation to increase the efficiency of purchasing in response to technological advances; globalization and changes in the nature of business (e.g. supply chain management, world class manufacturing, etc.). This is manifest in the implementation of EDI, ERP, materials management, supplier management systems and so on. With this in mind, however, the appropriate purchasing principles and practices differ depending on the goals and the market conditions of the buying organization, as well as on the nature of the purchase decision (from consumables, to capital goods).
Purchasing as an Integrated Function.
The objective is to develop purchasing skills and techniques throughout the organization, putting them in the hands of business managers and their departments. So, rather than a centralized department responsible for all requisitions and supplier relationships, purchasing authority is devolved closer to the point of use. It also involves input to purchasing decisions from a cross section of functional departments.
Implications for the vendor & sales team: What is the imprint of the purchasing department on your prospect’s buying decisions? How many people are likely to be involved in, or shape the decision?
· More accurate as regards requirements
· More competitive in respect of vendor bidding
· More careful in selection and
· More proactive in developing and exploiting the value of the vendor relationship.
Modern Purchasing also aims to be proactive, for example focusing on quality assurance rather than just quality control.
The Focus on Long Term Supplier Relationships.
Traditionally the focus was on selecting suppliers, evaluating their performance and dealing with supplier related deviations and disputes. However, a more forward looking and collaborative approach involves vendor development, as well as vendor management. This is key to delivering greater flexibility, as well as continuous innovation and improvement.
The trend is towards the development of relationships that are strategically important and involve a mutual commitment to long term success. This often entails fewer but stronger relationships, that is a concentration of supply in the hands of a selection of carefully chosen strategic supply partners.
Implications for the vendor: Are you considered a strategic supply partner by your key customers, or one of a larger number of vendors that will face consolidation?
More Systematic Vendor Assessment.
Quarterly Vendor Evaluation Form
Criterion
|
Weight
|
Rating
|
Total
|
On Time Delivery
|
|||
Quality Levels
|
|||
Support Levels
|
|||
Responsiveness & Flexibility
|
|||
Communication
|
|||
Value for Money
|
|||
Commitment Shown
|
|||
Level of Innovation
|
|||
Level of Expertise
|
|||
Etc.
|
|||
Total Score
|
Implications for the vendor: How are you being evaluated by your customers? What areas are you scoring well on? Are there areas where your score is weak?
The Science of Supplier Selection.
· Carefully short listing of suppliers, based on past experience and the many market information
· Understanding more about the supplier marketplace, including trends and drivers
· More clearly defined and accurate requirements, or specifications
· More effective RFx (RFI, RFP, etc.) documentation and processes
· Vendor assessments that are more systematic, structured and team based
· More carefully managed negotiation
One of the key tools in this process looks something like the following – a vendor assessment sheet with set criteria and weightings that is completed by the various members of the team.
Vendor Assessment Form
Criterion
|
Weight
|
Rating
|
Total
|
Price
|
|||
Terms
|
|||
Commitment
|
|||
Financial Strength
|
|||
Relevant Experience
|
|||
Track
Record |
|||
Quality of People
|
|||
Technical Performance
|
|||
Level of Expertise
|
|||
Etc.
|
Implications for the vendor: Do you know the criteria and associated weightings against which your business will be evaluated?
The implications noted above are areas we should all consider. We hope they are useful.
Buying is
undoubtedly as complex as selling; we need to put ourselves in the buyers shoes if we are going to help them to buy. Food for thought.
Related
by Ray Collis
Ray Collis is author of 4 books on accelerating growth, His articles are just a sample of the research underpinning the Growth Pitstop - a powerful formula for accelerating growth. Ray is available to speak at conferences and events internationally.
You must be logged in to post a comment Login